When Miners March
| Author | : | |
| Rating | : | 4.63 (933 Votes) |
| Asin | : | 1604863005 |
| Format Type | : | paperback |
| Number of Pages | : | 400 Pages |
| Publish Date | : | 2016-10-24 |
| Language | : | English |
DESCRIPTION:
Derek Aktion said Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book. I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in "Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book" according to Derek Aktion. I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 201Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the 'Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0. . How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the 'Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0. 010 but there are customer reviews from "Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book" according to Derek Aktion. I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 201Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the 'Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0. . How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the 'Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0. 008 & an editorial review from "Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book" according to Derek Aktion. I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 201Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the 'Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0. . How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the 'Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0. 01Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the 'Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0. . How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 19"Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book" according to Derek Aktion. I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 201Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the 'Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0. . How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the 'Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0. "Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book" according to Derek Aktion. I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 201Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the 'Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0. . How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the 'Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0. by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the 'Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a Please Amazon or PM provide an informative description of this book Derek Aktion I haven't read the book and would consider buying it except this page is totally confusing.This first edition was published in 2010 but there are customer reviews from 2008 & an editorial review from 2013. How'd that happen.It's a "first person account" of events in 1922 by an author apparently born in 1917. Precocious is too mild a claim.One review says articles in the book (the whole book is separate newspaper articles?) are from the '40s & '50s while another says it was written as a serial in the Daily Worker (CPUSA) which sounds sort of plausible although it's hard to imagine a 40. 0. Chip Deyerle said A Singular Hero's Story. Bill Blizzard is a hero!. There is no question in my mind. His recall of the events of the early 1900ss defines the reality of what culminated in the Blair Mountain War. Perhaps the stain of Constitutional law violations by the Mine owners, and the corporate moguls who tried to rule the coal fields of southern West Virginia was so great that the real story never made it to the front pages of the Nation's newspapers. Their money could buy all the "rights" in the world. Bill Blizzard has set that.in the context of the injured parties who were denied their Constitutional rights to freedom . "Essential Reading" according to D. L.. This is essential reading, especially for those interested in the history of Appalachian coalfields. It should also be read by those who think a malicious government has made war on a benevolent industry, or those who think the mine industry cares about the fate of its miners.
"An extraordinary account of a largely ignored but important event in the history of our nation." Howard Zinn, author, A People’s History of the United States
Chronicling the West Virginia Mine Wars of the 1920s, this first-hand account of the coal miners' uprisings offers a new perspective on labor unrest during this time period. Complete with previously unpublished family photographs and documents, this retelling shares the experiences of Bill Blizzard, the author's father who was the leader of the Red Neck Army. Addressing labor issues in contemporary times, this historical narrative makes clear the human costs of extracting coal for electricity.. The tensions between the union and the coal companies that led up to the famous Battle of Blair Mountain, the largest open and armed rebellion in United States history, are described in detail, as are its aftermath and legacy